Quote:
Well, to lighten things up a bit around here I'm copying a posting from the German Profiler Forum (I hope this is ok with you, Darxon - this is simply too funny to be kept away from the IVS forum ).

Quote:

Quote:
Quoting addicted2dvd: So in other words you are saying (As I thought from the beginning) that you don't care about the rules... you want it your way or no way at all.

Okay. Maybe this is a language barrier or your just not willing to understand. But I’ll try to explain it do you one final time:

On the one hand you got collectors. They collect DVDs just to have them. They rarely, if ever, watch them. They are much like winecollectors: collect, but never drink. (I know, that is not entirely true, I’ve seen Sideways. I’m just overstating this right now, so bear with me.)
They are more interested in that the all mighty Rules are obeyed and followed and every I is dotted and every T crossed. They don’t really care about movies. They are much more like CPAs who have to make sure that everything is correct, everything is in order. Much like GeStaPo’s in a 1984 police state.

On the other hand you got - as I said, what I like to call Tarantinos – like me. PPL who like and care about movies. For them the most information, credited or not, is only the beginning. The more info the better.

Let me give you an example: Beverly Hills Cop had eight (!) writers and one person who had the original idea back in the day when Steve McQueen was still alive. That script was originally for him, but it lay dormant for a long time. According to the film credits, who are based on the ruling of the WgoA only three or four of these writers are to be credited for the movie and they are in the credits as such.

It might be correct as to the Rules just to credit these four in the profile, but for a real film buff that is simply not acceptable.

These rules are faulty because they omit information!

You follow now what I’m saying?

Quote:
I wasn't sure if it was just me he blocked because I called him an idiot.