Home  |  Products  |  Downloads  |  Registration  |  Forums  |  Support  |  Database  |  My Profiler  |  T-Shirt Contest
Forums

The InterVocative forums are now closed to new postings.

Please visit the Invelos forums at www.invelos.com for DVD Profiler and related discussion.

These forums will remain available for reading indefinitely.

IVS Forums->DVD Profiler: Contribution Discussion Page: 1 2 3 4 5 ...20  Previous   Next
Studios (Locked)
Author Message
skipnet50
It all began with a mouse
Registered: October 4, 2000
Posts: 33,731
Posted:
Email this userView this user's DVD collection
Duck:

You make a VERY valid point and I will NOT pretend to be an expert in matters related to Studios and DVD Distribution is Europe or elsewhere and I am we aware that some times there can be a different company involved relating to various areas of release. I will however be happy to add region specific information to the above list as I receive it.

Keven I do not view DVD Production Studio as an important issue at all, they seem to me, at this moment to carry little importance and operate largely in the background. I think that probably to 98% percent of the people asked Casablanca Studio, would respond with Warner Bros.

Skip
skipnet50's collection
CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it.
InterVocative Chat
I'm Not Blockbuster...!
[a href="http://www.ya-shin.com/pages/posting.html&q
KDH1949
Have Gun, Will Travel
Registered: June 15, 2001
Posts: 2,408
Posted:
Email this userView this user's DVD collection
Quoting hal9g:
Quote:
Unless you want to filter on "The Criterion Collection" under studios.............

Can't filter on Description Field....

I knew there was some reason I want to see DVD Distributor listed.  I forgot about filtering on it.
Ken Hershberger
Eagles may soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines.
I’d like you to take a look at this gun. The balance is excellent, this trigger responds to a pressure of one ounce. This gun was handcrafted to my specifications—and I rarely draw it unless I mean to use it. --Paladin
Mithi
Sushi Annihilator
Registered: January 28, 2000
Posts: 623
Posted:
Visit this user's homepage
Quoting KDH1949:
Quote:
I knew there was some reason I want to see DVD Distributor listed.  I forgot about filtering on it.

Workaround: a tag "Criterion" ... much faster anyway ...
This is of course only usable on one or a few studios.

cya, Mithi
skipnet50
It all began with a mouse
Registered: October 4, 2000
Posts: 33,731
Posted:
Email this userView this user's DVD collection
Poor Man's Sticky again

Skip
skipnet50's collection
CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it.
InterVocative Chat
I'm Not Blockbuster...!
[a href="http://www.ya-shin.com/pages/posting.html&q
nolesrule
B5 nut
Registered: September 21, 2000
Posts: 569
Posted:
Email this userVisit this user's homepageView this user's DVD collection
Question about Billy Joel Greatest Hits Vol 3. DVD case and start of the feature says "Columbia Music Video". Copyright at the end of credits says "Sony Music Entertainment", which ahs multiple dates so includes the video copyrights. There is also an "Automatic Production" listed on the DVD case and in the end credits.

What should I list for Studio(s)?
nolesrule
My DVD Collection
 Last edited: by nolesrule
gardibolt
Digitally Obsessed
Registered: June 29, 2001
Posts: 1,522
Posted:
View this user's DVD collection
FYI, the Columbia TriStar Home Entertainment label is apparently being phased out.  They're (slowly) moving to Sony Pictures Home Entertainment, and new pressings of existing discs may or may not change the name of the label, so care will need to be taken on this point.  Presumably like the SRP, the original distributor should be named on the profile, assuming the UPC doesn't change?
"This movie has warped my fragile little mind."
skipnet50
It all began with a mouse
Registered: October 4, 2000
Posts: 33,731
Posted:
Email this userView this user's DVD collection
Noles:

If CMV and SME are all that are involved I would list both.

Gard:

I know and once I have a clear picture of what Sony plans to do I will make the necessary adjustment, my suspicion is that the film divisions will not change, the DVD Distribution arm I an less sure of.

Skip
skipnet50's collection
CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it.
InterVocative Chat
I'm Not Blockbuster...!
[a href="http://www.ya-shin.com/pages/posting.html&q
gardibolt
Digitally Obsessed
Registered: June 29, 2001
Posts: 1,522
Posted:
View this user's DVD collection
I think that's right, Skip.  There's too much value in the "Columbia Pictures" name (and the lady with the torch  ), and to a lesser extent the TriStar name and the Pegasus for them to stop using them on film releases.  As far as I can tell, there are still going to be several film divisions with different names, but the plan (which seems to be working haphazardly thus far) is to wrap all or most of the DVD distribution into SPHE.
"This movie has warped my fragile little mind."
Shintaro
DVD Slave
Registered: January 5, 2003
Posts: 676
Posted:
View this user's DVD collection
Quick question,
Every Lucasfilm film shows the name as 'Lucasfilm Ltd', but the fine print shows 'Lucasfilm Ltd.', which is the correct way to go with this??
Lopek
Registered: June 23, 2001
Posts: 3,551
Posted:
Quoting Shintaro:
Quote:
Quick question,
Every Lucasfilm film shows the name as 'Lucasfilm Ltd', but the fine print shows 'Lucasfilm Ltd.', which is the correct way to go with this??

This comes from a contribution I made, that Shintaro has voted No for, because I used "Lucasfilm Ltd."

I believe this is correct - anytime when the the company name is used as normal text - both on the box, in the closing credits and on their website, it is stated with the '.'

The logo does not include the '.', but this is purely asthetic reasons, and if we are match the logo exactly it should be "LUCASFILM LTD".
karlpov
Member
Registered: September 8, 2001
Posts: 4,410
Posted:
View this user's DVD collection
Can someone tell me why "The Criterion Collection" ever goes into the Desc field since any other DVD company is listed as a studio? I once endeavored to remove these Descs, but they were quickly restored and I don't see much point to ping ponging on this. But I don't really see that it makes much sense, except perhaps in such cases where it fulfills the explicit function of the Desc field, i.e. where the same movie is available from another company, which is true some but not most of the time with Criterion releases.
MarkEJHarrison
Out of ideas
Registered: December 20, 2001
Posts: 2,506
Posted:
Email this userView this user's DVD collection
Quoting karlpov:
Quote:
Can someone tell me why "The Criterion Collection" ever goes into the Desc field since any other DVD company is listed as a studio?


As you mentioned, sometimes (rarely) the same movie has a non Criterion version.  Then it's actually valid.  For the others, I think it's nice to see some uniformity.

I've also seen this field used for personal reasons.  "Fox Studio Classics" is another example.  Sometimes when you're particularly proud of certain discs or a series or something, it's nice to make them stand out in some special manner.

I'm guilty.  On the other hand, I almost never contribute, so it really doesn't matter in my case.
"the main database is protected by many fanatics who argue minutia over the rules hour after hour, day after day, year after year" - Cliff
karlpov
Member
Registered: September 8, 2001
Posts: 4,410
Posted:
View this user's DVD collection
Actually, Fox Studio Classics is a particular series, not the issuer -- Fox puts out other stuff as well. Whether it's a mark to be proud of now that they've honored Return to Peyton Place is another question.... I too use Desc for particular series, e.g. Midnite Movies. I have used it for the various series MGM uses to label its movies, but have not been consistent. Criterion, on the other hand, is Criterion, right? Or should Criterion be considered a series put out by, who is it, Wellspring or somebody?
skipnet50
It all began with a mouse
Registered: October 4, 2000
Posts: 33,731
Posted:
Email this userView this user's DVD collection
My only comment on this is that MOST users appear to want it in the Descriptor field, so that's fine by me. I don't consider it a big deal.

Skip
skipnet50's collection
CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it.
InterVocative Chat
I'm Not Blockbuster...!
[a href="http://www.ya-shin.com/pages/posting.html&q
Shintaro
DVD Slave
Registered: January 5, 2003
Posts: 676
Posted:
View this user's DVD collection
Quoting Lopek:
Quote:

The logo does not include the '.', but this is purely asthetic reasons, and if we are match the logo exactly it should be "LUCASFILM LTD".

Actually, the logo in the films and on the packaging shows "LUCASFILM Ltd"

So anyone have an opinion on this?
skipnet50
It all began with a mouse
Registered: October 4, 2000
Posts: 33,731
Posted:
Email this userView this user's DVD collection
I think users for the last five years have used Lucasfilm or Lucasfilm Ltd., no one I am aware of uses the All caps  version or it would show up in my Studio Database, when I get around to putting that together, it would be properly listed as

Lucasfilm, Ltd.

Skip
skipnet50's collection
CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it.
InterVocative Chat
I'm Not Blockbuster...!
[a href="http://www.ya-shin.com/pages/posting.html&q
IVS Forums->DVD Profiler: Contribution Discussion Page: 1 2 3 4 5 ...20  Previous   Next