Hello.



If I have previously written in the above picture kind, updated profiles this particular below piece of text


If there is something in the profile that needs fixing, please tell me so that it is easier for me to fix it.


So Why are these rejected again and again multiple times. Without being given information to me, that what is wrong with the profiles, so how could I even correct the informations, when I don't know the reason for the rejections ? 

Quoting Tommi6:

Quote:
Hello.



If I have previously written in the above picture kind, updated profiles this particular below piece of text


If there is something in the profile that needs fixing, please tell me so that it is easier for me to fix it.


So Why are these rejected again and again multiple times. Without being given information to me, that what is wrong with the profiles, so how could I even correct the informations, when I don't know the reason for the rejections ? 

You are expected to have read and followed the contribution rules. Be as specific as possible as to why you are making the changes and state sources.

The reviewer most likely does not have the disc you are making changes to, therefore can't tell you what need fixed. "They" are relying on you to document your changes and why you are making them. (for example, if you change the rating or rating detail, state the source of the change)

Here is the link for the example white chicks covers, why i have been cutting excess material from cover pictures, background is intentionally gray so that the excess material stand out better.

https://i.imgur.com/EbzNCBL.png

Is there anything wrong with this white chicks profile now, I updated the cover photos to much better quality ones ?

Never mind

Added EAN 5051160229416 to my collection so I could check out your contribution.
Notes follow:

Your changed region but did not state a source.
Although you did not change cast or crew notes state they came from the same profile (5051160229416). (that portion only needs to be filled out if you are change cast or crew and do not mention credits previously.)


Previous contribution from Dasa stated "-Disc regions checked with VSO."  VSO Inspector is a tool which checks the region on the disc - disc taking precedence or the cover.

Making changes to the cast or crew and stating the source as the same profile will result (most likely) in a decline of the contribution.

As I replied earlier in the thread, please read and follow all the contribution rules and provide clear, concise
sources for the changes made. Extraneous notes concerning portions of the profile you did not change only leads to confusion.

Do not expect detailed notes on a decline, the reviewers most likely do no have a physical copy of the DVD available to them, nor the time to provide extensive notes.

I am just another user, not a reviewer or associated with the company. If you decide to contribute, you are accepting the responsibility to to provide sufficient, easy to follow information in the contribution notes to allow a proper decision for acceptance or denial.

Quoting Gamemaster:

Quote:
As said your White Chicks covers look better, but are declined again. What was the reason they were declined?

No one gave me any feedback, on what the reason for the rejection was

And this time the Avatar, EAN/UPC Code 6-438044-252057, this time front cover size is width 749 pixels x height 1068 pixels, back cover size is width 744 pixels
x 1065 pixels

So this time the size of the covers shouldn't be a problem anymore